BDSTCU Art of Dumpster Question Discussion

BDSTCU Art of Dumpster Question Discussion

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

BDSTCU Art of Dumpster Question Discussion

Roundtable #4

This assignment is your final exam. The texts are posted under homework – there are two choices. Pick one.

Turn in your fourth and last roundtable assignment. Each of the 5 questions should be followed by a paragraph containing a topic sentence (the answer to the question) and support (at least 5 sentences, containing two direct quotes from the text) and a conclusion.

Make sure your quotes are introduced properly, cited, and explained. Introduce your quotes appropriately, so that your audience understands them fully in context. After each quote, explain its relevance. Follow MLA format.

Write in your own words – your word match on SafeAssign should be less than 20%.

https://www.laprogram.org/docs/EighnerOnDumpsterDi…

BDSTCU Art of Dumpster Question Discussion

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow BDSTCU Art of Dumpster Question Discussion

BDSTCU Art of Dumpster Question Discussion

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!