Environmental Science Declining Biodiversity Discussion

Environmental Science Declining Biodiversity Discussion

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Environmental Science Declining Biodiversity Discussion

Online Discussion 6 – Declining Biodiversity

Instructions:

Same as last time but the topic this time should be: Declining Biodiversity

Read and understand the attached pdf files , and then find an article about energy that relates to something that we’ve talked about in class or read about in “The Story of More” or “Healing Earth” which can be found in this link https://healingearth.ijep.net

This article should be written for a general audience. Add a brief summary of the article and your opinions about it.

To get full points, you must:

1. Post your article with the summary and opinions
2. Comment (two sentences) on the potential biases in your article: who was it produced by, do they have hidden agendas, are there clear biases in writing, do the sources that they pull from (if any) seem reliable.
3. Read and comment on the below two student posts:

Students Posts:

1- Xing,

https://wwf.panda.org/wwf_news/?294770/WWF-welcomes-UN-report-underlining-symbiotic-relationship-between-people-biodiversity-and-sustainable-developmentLinks to an external site.

The theme of this year’s World Earth Day WWF is “Symbiosis with Nature.” 2020 is a “super year” for biodiversity conservation.
It took us millions of years to evolve not only an intelligent creature, but also an incomparably exquisite adaptive relationship with our living environment and other creatures.

This relationship is not only a materially supported relationship (a good environment keeps us healthy, and abundant resources make us rich), but also a psychological and emotional connection. “Human” is the main body to protect biodiversity. Without human beings, or putting aside the human position, all of this is meaningless.

2- Isabel,

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/10/reader-center/biodiversity-loss-species-extinction.htmlLinks to an external site.

To summarize this article, it talks about the effects that is being affected by these climate and biodiversity losses. In my opinion, this article is very informative and something that everyone should be more knowledgeable in.

Since this is a New York times i do not believe that there are any biases in this article. They only provide informative information that can be beneficial to us if we want to make a change.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Environmental Science Declining Biodiversity Discussion

Environmental Science Declining Biodiversity Discussion

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!