Science of Anthropogenic Climate Change Discussion Assignment

Science of Anthropogenic Climate Change Discussion Assignment

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Science of Anthropogenic Climate Change Discussion Assignment

Your discussion board assignment for this week is to return your own posting from last week and provide an evidence-based argument that disputes whatever claim was made against the science of anthropogenic climate change.

Go ahead and copy your posting from last week, and then reply to yourself with three to four sentences of rebuttal. (If you didn’t make a posting last week, you’ll still need to find a website that disputes climate change in order to complete this discussion board.) Please provide a weblink to reference any sources that you have used to back up your rebuttal.

Here are a few resources to assist you with this endeavor:

1) The following link contains a recent interview with a conservative pundit, Jerry Taylor. The interview recounts Mr. Taylor’s past skepticism about anthropogenic climate change, as well as the reasoning that led him to now accept the consensus science view and advocate for climate change mitigation policies. https://theintercept.com/2017/04/28/how-a-professi…

2) Skeptical Science is a comprehensive website with a large, searchable library of resources that explain the science of global warming and climate change, while also debunking many of the common arguments made by those who dispute this science. Here is the weblink: https://www.skepticalscience.com/

3. This is a link that describes why pure statistical models about climate change are no substitute for physics-based models. There’s an old-saying that correlation does not equal causation… and understanding causation in physical sciences always requires a physical explanation, not simply a statistical relationship. https://climatefeedback.org/claimreview/incorrect-…
4. For any true science nerds among you, here is a

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Science of Anthropogenic Climate Change Discussion Assignment

Science of Anthropogenic Climate Change Discussion Assignment

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!