Heard Round the World Discussion Case Study

Heard Round the World Discussion Case Study

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Heard Round the World Discussion Case Study

General Goal for all Cases: We want to evaluate business’s social responsibility with respect to its obligations to its stakeholders and society? We want to know if firms are or are not acting in ways that are economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic.

If they are not, we need to understand why so we can make appropriate recommendations to correct the problem.

And while firms sometimes fall short of their social responsibilities (both willfully and through negligence), we must consider that the critics of business sometimes make false accusations to extort firms or manipulate them into a defensive negotiating position.

Specific Tasks

Provide an Initial Response of about 500 words for each Discussion Topics

Read the Case, Dead Peasant Life Insurance Policies (Case #30, p. 730; and Profiting from Death articles). Compose a short analysis of the case (no more than 500 words) using the general criteria provided in Carroll’s frame work described on page 612 (as modified for our class, see below).

What is the issue?

Facts and Assumptions?

Stakeholders?

CSR Analysis

Economics

Law

Ethics

Philanthropy and other factors: altruism, power, politics, self-interest, incentives, etc.

Evaluation

Recommendations

Heard Round the World Discussion Case Study

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Heard Round the World Discussion Case Study

Heard Round the World Discussion Case Study

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!