Analyze the Case Situation Using the Core Model

Analyze the Case Situation Using the Core Model

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Analyze the Case Situation Using the Core Model

Case Analysis Template[footnoteRef:1] [1: For general case preparation strategies, see also: http://plato.acadiau.ca/courses/Busi/IntroBus/CASEMETHOD.html.]

Current Situation

Step 1. The Facts

WHO is the decision maker?
WHAT is the task to be done (decision to make, problem to solve, opportunity to seize)?
WHY has the issue arisen now? What is its significance to the organization?
WHEN does the decision maker have to decide, resolve, act or dispose of the issue? What is the urgency to the situation?

Step 2. In Depth Analysis

Analyze the case situation using the core model at right. Consider the following sorts of questions (the exact questions will vary somewhat depending on the case).

What business problem are we trying to solve?

Why is that problem important to the business?

How does the nature of the current IT contribute to or alleviate the problem?

How does the current organization (structure, people, culture etc.) contribute to or alleviate the problem?

How did we get here? Critically assess the factors that have contributed to our current situation?

Criteria

Use your analysis of the current situation to identify the relevant criteria.

Criteria	Meaning/Measurement	Why Selected?

Analysis of Alternatives

What options are given in the case?

Are there additional options you think need to be considered?

		Performance Against Criteria
Options		1	2	3
	1
	2
	3

Decision

Which option do you think is best? Why?

How does this proposed solution address the business problem identified in your analysis of the current situation?

Implementation

How will you go about implementing your decision (who will do what, when, and how)?

Short Term (= ________ days/wks/mths/yrs)	Medium Term (= _____ days/wks/mths/yrs)	Long Term (= ________ days/wks/mths/yrs)

What are the major risks associated with your decision?

What steps will you take to avoid or mitigate those risks?

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Case Situation Using the Core Model

Analyze the Case Situation Using the Core Model

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!