California Nurses Association Safe Nurse to Patient Ratio Project
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
California Nurses Association Safe Nurse to Patient Ratio Project
For years, nurses across the nation have been asking for safer staffing ratios. With tighter budgets and substantial increases in the number of patients, nurses have been working in situations that endanger both patients and themselves. Mandated staffing ratios are key addressing this issue.
Top of Form
Find Nursing Programs
Current Degree
Desired Degree
Show Me Programs
Bottom of Form
However, as of 2017, California is still the only state to have a safe patient ratio law.
The first bill to mandate a safe nurse to patient ratio took effect in January 2004. For 13 years leading up to the historic bill, the California Nurses Association worked diligently to advocate and lobby for the law despite resistance from the powerful hospital industry. When the bill first passed, many within the healthcare community hoped that it would lead the way for other states to adopt similar laws.
Current Legislation
Unfortunately, other states did not follow suit as hoped. However, with two national bills set to appear before the Senate and the House, all this may change.
The Nurse Staffing Standards for Hospital Patient Safety and Quality Care Act (S.1063) (Brown) seeks to mandate nurse to patient ratios, especially in acute care situations. The act also seeks to empower nurses by obligating RNs to act in the best interest of the patient and advocate for patients without regard to bureaucratic and budgetary concerns of fear of being reprimanded for putting the patient first.
The Nurse Staffing Standards for Hospital Patient Safety and Quality Care Act (H.R.2392) (Schakowsky) also recognizes the fact that nurses are often put into difficult situations where they are pressured to care for too many patients, which results in poorer care overall.
The bill seeks to remove these external pressures and allow nurses and patients to benefit from safe care ratios. In addition, the bill is designed to clearly dictate that nurses should always put the well-being of the patient above all other concerns.
It comes as a surprise to many that these common-sense mandates have not already been written into law. The legal protection they provide for both nurses and patients surely increases the quality of care.
Thus far, the hospital industry has been able to successfully block any regulations that may affect their bottom line. Both the current Senate and House bills are closely modeled after California’s law and are the most promising development in the fight for safe staff to patient ratios.
Many national nursing organizations are working to garner support for the bills and mobilize their members to contact their representatives.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow California Nurses Association Safe Nurse to Patient Ratio Project
California Nurses Association Safe Nurse to Patient Ratio Project