Week 3 Ethical Issues Discussion Paper

Week 3 Ethical Issues Discussion Paper

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Week 3 Ethical Issues Discussion Paper

Chapter 4—Ethical Issues

Compare and contract legal and ethical issues.

What determines how a person approaches and solves ethical dilemmas

Define moral indifference—provide an example

Define moral uncertainty—provide an example from your own healthcare experience

Moral distress—provide an example from your own health care experiences

What is an ethical dilemma? Give an example

Describe deontological approach to ethical decision making? What does this mean?

Describe a teleological approach to ethical decision making? What does this mean?

Compare and contrast the 4 different frameworks for ethical decision making

What is autonomy—give an example from your experience

Define the following terms—how have you used/understood these principles in your nursing practice?

Beneficence

Paternalism

Utility

Justice

Veracity

Fidelity

Confidentiality

What is the MORAL decision-making model—how does this work?

Name important strategies to promote ethical behavior in healthcare.

Chapter 5—Legal and Legislative Issues

Define civil law and what is involved in civil cases

What are the reasons that nurses are at increased risk for legal liability in nursing practice?

What does the term Standard of Care mean in nursing? Why is this so important?

Define malpractice and the term professional negligence (the 5 criteria needed to fulfill this definition)….provide examples of each criteria to deepen your understanding

What does the term “under ordinary circumstances” means as it relates to professional negligence?

Define these legal terms that are pertinent to nursing practice—be sure you can relate these term to nursing practice

Stare decisis

Liability

tort

respondeat superior

vicarious liability

product liability

res ipsa loquitur

Define intentional torts and give as many examples as you can related to nursing practice

What are some common reasons nurses are sued (claims filed against them)

BON—Board of Nursing—what is their responsibility to the public?

Define the Nurse Practice Act and its role in your ability to practice nursing?

Define, compare and contrast the three forms of consent:

Informed consent

Implied consent

Express consent

What is HIPAA and what is its importance to healthcare/your nursing practice?

What are the parameters of Good Samaritan Immunity?

Describe the Patient Self-Determination Act (PSDA) of 1991 and how it changed healthcare

List the common causes of nursing license revocation

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Week 3 Ethical Issues Discussion Paper

Week 3 Ethical Issues Discussion Paper

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!