Making Sense of Arguments Term Project

Making Sense of Arguments Term Project

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Making Sense of Arguments Term Project

Making Sense of Arguments Discussion Forum Instructions

Each student must post (1) substantial initial post with a minimum of 300 words by 1/17/2022 The student must also reply to at least (2) reply posts per topic each at a minimum of 75 words per reply by 1/19/2022 (student replies will be provided once available)

All posts and replies must contain at least (2) professional references, one may be the course textbook, properly cited in the current APA format. All replies in the discussion forum should enhance the discussion. All non-informative messages posted in the discussion forum will not be counted towards the required number of replies for that topic. *Late discussion posts are not accepted in this course.

Discussion Topic: * Does violence in video games lead to criminal behavior?

Select an issue from the following list and write a 300-word discussion post defending a claim pertaining to the issue. Make sure your post has the following basic structure:

Thesis statement (the claim to be supported)

Arguments supporting the thesis (with at least 2 citations from scholarly sources)

Assessment of objections

Conclusion

Making Sense of Arguments Term Project

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Making Sense of Arguments Term Project

Making Sense of Arguments Term Project

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!