Vision as Story-Telling Assignment Discussion Paper
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Vision as Story-Telling Assignment Discussion Paper
Assignment 2: Personal Goal Setting
In your textbook the authors discuss a technique for developing a vision called “Vision as Story-Telling”.
Use this technique to develop your own personal vision statement.
Write a story of what your life will look like in 5 years.
Include a discussion of your core beliefs and what changes in your life you’d like to see made (include at least two). Next develop specific goals for yourself (at least five) for the next year to help make this vision a reality.
Finally, discuss two reasons that identifying your vision and goals will help to make them happen and two possible stumbling blocks that may impede your progress towards your vision.
Your paper should be no more than 4 – 5 pages and in current APA edition format. Submit this to the M4: Assignment 2 Dropbox by Wednesday, July 9, 2014.
Assignment 2 Grading Criteria Maximum Points Developed a personal vision story 25 Described own core beliefs 10 Detailed two changes desired 15 Developed five specific goals that align with making the vision a reality 30 Discussed two reasons that identifying vision and goals is useful 10 Discussed two possible stumbling blocks 10 Total: 100
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Vision as Story-Telling Assignment Discussion Paper
Vision as Story-Telling Assignment Discussion Paper