Negotiating with Ethics and Integrity

Negotiating with Ethics and Integrity

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Negotiating with Ethics and Integrity

Negotiating with ethics and integrity means conducting negotiations in a fair and honest manner, and taking into consideration the interests and rights of all parties involved. The following are some key principles to consider when negotiating with ethics and integrity:

Be transparent and clear about your intentions: Be clear about what you want to achieve through the negotiation, and make sure your counterpart knows your position and expectations. Be transparent about what you are willing to offer and what you are not willing to compromise on.

Respect the other party: Treat the other party with respect and dignity, even if you disagree with their position. Avoid using aggressive or manipulative tactics, and instead focus on finding a mutually beneficial solution.

Keep your word: If you make a commitment, follow through on it. Your reputation is one of your most valuable assets, and keeping your word builds trust and credibility with your counterpart.

Avoid lying or misleading: Do not make false or misleading statements in order to gain an advantage in the negotiation. This undermines trust and can have serious long-term consequences for your reputation and relationship with the other party.

Consider the long-term impact: Consider the long-term implications of the agreement, and make sure it is sustainable and in the best interests of both parties. Don’t focus solely on short-term gains, as this can harm your reputation and the relationship with the other party.

Be open to compromise: Be open to finding a solution that meets the needs and interests of both parties. Negotiating is about finding a mutually acceptable agreement, and this often requires compromise from both sides.

Consider ethical and legal considerations: Consider ethical and legal considerations in the negotiation process. Ensure that the agreement is in compliance with laws and regulations, and that it does not violate ethical standards.

By following these principles, you can ensure that you negotiate with ethics and integrity, and build strong, sustainable relationships with the other party. Negotiating with ethics and integrity also helps to maintain your reputation, as well as the reputation of your organization, and can have a positive impact on your long-term success.

In conclusion, ethics and integrity play a critical role in the negotiation process. By treating the other party with respect and fairness, being transparent and honest about your intentions, and considering the long-term impact of the agreement, you can negotiate with confidence and build strong, sustainable relationships with your counterpart.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

Negotiating with Ethics and Integrity

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!