Wells Fargo Scandal: Consumer Fraud

Wells Fargo Scandal: Consumer Fraud

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Wells Fargo Scandal: Consumer Fraud

The Wells Fargo scandal, also known as the “fake accounts scandal,” was a major consumer fraud scandal that came to light in 2016. The scandal involved the creation of millions of unauthorized bank and credit card accounts by Wells Fargo employees in order to meet sales targets and earn bonuses.

The fraudulent activity was first uncovered by the Los Angeles Times in 2013, and later by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the City and County of Los Angeles. It was revealed that Wells Fargo employees had opened over 2 million unauthorized deposit and credit card accounts, and transferred funds from customers’ legitimate accounts to these fake accounts without their knowledge or consent.

The fraudulent activity was widespread, with employees opening fake accounts across all of Wells Fargo’s lines of business and in all regions of the country. The bank’s aggressive sales culture and pressure on employees to meet sales targets were identified as major contributing factors.

Wells Fargo faced significant repercussions as a result of the scandal. The bank was fined $185 million by the CFPB, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the City and County of Los Angeles. Additionally, Wells Fargo was ordered to pay $142 million in restitution to affected customers and $50 million to the City and County of Los Angeles. The bank also faced multiple class-action lawsuits, and its CEO, John Stumpf, resigned in the wake of the scandal.

The scandal also had a major impact on Wells Fargo’s reputation, with the bank facing significant public backlash and a decline in customer trust. The bank has since taken steps to improve its sales practices and to prevent similar fraudulent activity in the future.

The Wells Fargo Scandal has been a huge blow to the reputation of the bank and its customers. The bank has been accused of creating millions of unauthorized bank and credit card accounts in order to meet sales targets and earn bonuses. The fraudulent activity was widespread, with employees opening fake accounts across all of Wells Fargo’s lines of business and in all regions of the country. The bank’s aggressive sales culture and pressure on employees to meet sales targets were identified as major contributing factors. The bank was fined $185 million by the CFPB, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the City and County of Los Angeles. Additionally, Wells Fargo was ordered to pay $142 million in restitution to affected customers and $50 million to the City and County of Los Angeles. The bank also faced multiple class-action lawsuits, and its CEO, John Stumpf, resigned in the wake of the scandal.

The bank has since taken steps to improve its sales practices and to prevent similar fraudulent activity in the future. But the reputational damage has been done, and the bank will have to work hard to regain the trust of its customers and the public.

Wells Fargo Scandal: Consumer Fraud

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Wells Fargo Scandal: Consumer Fraud

Wells Fargo Scandal: Consumer Fraud

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!