Managerial Styles and Decision Impact

Managerial Styles and Decision Impact

Table of Contents

Toggle

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Managerial Styles and Decision Impact

Managerial styles refer to the ways in which managers interact with their employees and make decisions. Different styles can have a significant impact on the effectiveness of a manager and the performance of the organization.

One popular managerial style is the autocratic style, in which the manager makes all decisions independently and employees have little input. This can be effective in situations where quick decisions are needed and the manager has the necessary expertise and experience. However, it can also lead to low employee morale and a lack of innovation.

Another style is the democratic style, in which the manager involves employees in the decision-making process and values their input. This can lead to higher employee engagement and commitment, as well as increased creativity and innovation. However, it can also be slower and less efficient than the autocratic style.

Laissez-faire style is a less common style, in which the manager gives employees a great deal of autonomy and freedom in decision-making. This can lead to high levels of employee satisfaction and motivation, but can also result in a lack of direction and control.

Situational leadership is a style that adapts to the situation at hand. Manager use different style based on the situation and employees involved. This approach can be very effective, as it allows the manager to use the most appropriate style for the specific situation and employees.

The consultative style is a blend of autocratic and democratic styles, where the manager makes the final decision, but takes into account the input and opinions of employees. This approach can be effective in situations where a quick decision is needed, but input from employees is valuable.

Ultimately, the most effective managerial style is one that is flexible and adaptable to the specific needs of the organization and its employees. Managers should be able to recognize when a particular style is not working and be willing to change their approach.

In terms of decision impact, the style a manager uses can have a significant effect on the outcome of the decision. Autocratic managers tend to make quick decisions, but may lack input from employees and may miss out on valuable perspectives. Democratic managers may take longer to make decisions, but they are often more well-rounded and take into account the input of employees. Laissez-faire managers may make decisions that lack direction and control, while a situational leader adapts to the situation and employees, leading to more effective decisions. The consultative style can lead to decisions that are more well-rounded and take into account the input of employees, but also make sure that the final decision is made quickly.

In conclusion, a manager’s style plays a crucial role in decision making and the overall performance of the organization. Different styles have their own advantages and drawbacks, and managers should be able to adapt their style as per the needs of the organization and employees. Flexibility and adaptability are key to effective decision making and managerial success.

Managerial Styles and Decision Impact

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Managerial Styles and Decision Impact

Managerial Styles and Decision Impact

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!