Professionalism in Academic Writing

Professionalism in Academic Writing

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Professionalism in Academic Writing

The legitimacy and effectiveness of the research and writing produced by academic writers depend on their professionalism. There are several methods to show professionalism, including the following:

Observing deadlines Professional academic writers are aware of how crucial it is to fulfill due dates for submission to scholarly publications or for their customers. They put forth a lot of effort to do their assignment on time.

 

Clear contact is maintained throughout the writing process by professional academic writers who are attentive to their customers. They can articulate their ideas well and are receptive to criticism and adjustments.

Maintaining secrecy: Accredited academic writers are aware of the value of maintaining confidentiality and take precautions to protect the privacy and security of the work they generate.

Respecting moral principles: In their research and writing, professional academic writers adhere to moral principles, which include accurate citation and source acknowledgment. They also make sure that none of their work is copied.

Maintaining a high degree of expertise: Academic writers that work professionally are very informed and proficient in their professions. They keep up with the most recent studies and advancements in their fields of specialization, which enables them to deliver excellent work that has been well researched.

Giving customers value: It is the goal of professional academic writers to provide clients value via their work. This might include providing knowledge, direction, and assistance throughout through the writing process.

Overall, academic writers’ professionalism is essential to the quality of their work and the confidence of their customers. Academic writers may identify themselves as competent and dependable contributors to the academic community by meeting deadlines, communicating clearly, keeping confidentiality and ethical norms, retaining competence, and offering value.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Professionalism in Academic Writing

Professionalism in Academic Writing

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!