Essential Guide to Academic Writing for Scientific Research
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Essential Guide to Academic Writing for Scientific Research
Academic writing is an important aspect of scientific research, as it helps to effectively communicate findings to other researchers and the general public. Here are some tips for improving your Academic writing skills:
Use clear and concise language: Use simple, straightforward language whenever possible. Avoid using jargon or complex language that may be unfamiliar to your readers.
Use active voice: Writing in the active voice makes your writing more direct and engaging. Instead of saying “The experiment was conducted by the researcher,” say “The researcher conducted the experiment.”
Use strong verbs: Using strong verbs helps to make your writing more concise and powerful. For example, instead of saying “make,” say “construct.”
Use clear headings and subheadings: Headings and subheadings help to organize your writing and make it easier for readers to follow along.
Use bullet points or numbered lists: These can be effective ways to present lists or sets of information in a clear and concise manner.
Use figures and tables: These can be helpful in presenting data or results in a more visual way. Just be sure to label them clearly and explain any abbreviations used.
Cite your sources: Properly citing your sources is crucial for demonstrating the credibility of your research. Use a consistent citation style, such as APA or MLA, and be sure to include a list of references at the end of your document.
Edit and proofread: Make sure to carefully review your writing for spelling and grammar errors. It can be helpful to have someone else read over your work as well.
Use online resources: There are many online resources available to help improve your Academic writing skills. Consider taking a course or workshop, or seek out writing guides or style manuals to help you hone your craft.
By following these tips, you can improve your Academic writing skills and effectively communicate the results of your scientific research to a wide audience.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Essential Guide to Academic Writing for Scientific Research
Essential Guide to Academic Writing for Scientific Research