BUC Human Papilloma Virus Case Study

BUC Human Papilloma Virus Case Study

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

BUC Human Papilloma Virus Case Study

Locate a Cohort, Case-Control, Cross Sectional Study, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial or a Systematic Review/Meta Analysis in the American Journal of Epidemiology or any other Epidemiology journal.

Select an article that interests you.

Evaluate using the criteria below.

All responses must be in the order requested below.

•     What is the research problem being investigated?
•     What is the rationale for studying this problem?
• How comprehensive is the literature review?
• What are the implications of the research?
• Who is the study sample?
•     How was the research sample obtained?
• What biases, exist in the sample if any?
• What is the research design of the study (cohort, case control etc.)?
• What study methods were used?
• How are these data presented?
• Is the method of presentation effective?
• Is the method of presentation accurate?
• What were the conclusions of the study?
• What are the implications of the finding for practice and future research?
• What are the limitations of the study?

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow BUC Human Papilloma Virus Case Study

BUC Human Papilloma Virus Case Study

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!