Hospital Staff Privileges Case Study Paper

Hospital Staff Privileges Case Study Paper

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Hospital Staff Privileges Case Study Paper

Please review the following scenario and answer the questions after it considering the topics of credentialing, hospital privileges, physician supervision, malpractice, hospital structure, legality, and ethics.

Hospital staff privileges are the authority given to a clinician to practice at a hospital within the scope of privileges granted to him or her by that hospital. This is an example of IU’s information on this topic:

https://iuhealth.org/for-providers/medical-staff-office

James Bailey is an intern at Chicago Grace Hospital. As an intern, James is not permitted to complete surgery without a supervising doctor. This is clear in his employment agreement and James is aware of this stipulation.

On December 1st a horrible winter storm roared through Chicago and the hospital lost power. Backup generators were working but James was moving a patient on a gurney in an area of the hospital where a backup generator did not click on. He became stuck in an elevator with his patient. The patient was pregnant and needed an emergency C section. James understood how to perform this surgery but he was not authorized to do so. The patient’s vitals continued to get worse. After three minutes James grabbed the scalpel and started to complete the surgery. The elevator doors did open at this point but as he had already started a course of action he said he didn’t notice. He continued the surgery in the elevator. Three minutes later, the attending physician found James and finished the surgery. The patient died as she bled out in the elevator but the infant survived.

The hospital did complete an investigation and there is video showing the elevator door opening as he began his first cut.

Using the information in the chapters for the week, what will happen to James? Is it possible to revoke his hospital privileges? Considering hospital structure discussed in Chapter 9 who can be sued for this incident? Did James do the ethical or legal thing? How does malpractice relate to this scenario? Again these answers should be included in a 2-3 page paper on the topic. Include any references as needed.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Hospital Staff Privileges Case Study Paper

Hospital Staff Privileges Case Study Paper

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!