UWF Water Quality in the Indian River Lagoon Case Study

UWF Water Quality in the Indian River Lagoon Case Study

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

UWF Water Quality in the Indian River Lagoon Case Study

Learning outcomes:

Demonstrate proficiency with data visualization using the 3D Maps feature in Microsoft Excel

Access Microsoft Excel

Resources:

Excel-Accessing-UWF.docx

First, use the resource above to familiarize yourself with how to access Microsoft Excel at UWF.

NOTE: To complete the 3D Maps assignments in this course, you will need to access a Windows version of Excel (version 2016 or higher).

Assignment with 3D maps in Microsoft Excel

Resources:

Excel-3DMaps-WaterQuality-Assignment.docx

Now, complete the assignment outlined in the provided instructions.

This assignment is graded – you will submit the items below to earn credit for your work.

WATCH AND LEARN HELPFUL VIDEOS FOR THIS PROJECT:

Intro to our data, creating 3D map (Links to an external site.)

Cleaning data, 3D map (Links to an external site.)

Adding categories: Cities (Links to an external site.)

Final thoughts before starting your data tour (Links to an external site.)

To complete this section:

Please complete these items:

Upload these two files containing the requirements indicated in the assignment link above to the UPLOAD: Excel 3D Maps for PROJECT H2O (1 Excel file + 1 MP4 file) area (under Assignments):

Excel Maps Project H2O.xlsx (containing the table you created from the provided data and settings for the video file you created)

Lastname-Project H2O.MP4 file (<60 sec, containing the video file you created)

Critical Thinking with your Peers

Resources (repeated from earlier section of this module):

Overview of Public Health and GIS [article]

Use of GIS Mapping as a Public Health Tool—From Cholera to Cancer [article]

Privacy_and_Confidentiality_in_Health_GIS.pdf [presentation]

To conclude the case study, post to the My future planning ideas for Project H20 DISCUSSION area. Please include these items in your posting:

ITEM 1, confidentiality (2 points): Should Mallory be concerned about employing any steps noted in the module resources to ensure confidentiality of the spatial data she is using? If so, why, and which methods do you recommend? Include at least one APA in-text citation within your answer to justify your response based on the articles linked in this module.

ITEM 2, space-time representation (2 points): After the first year of Mallory’s outreach, how might she consider the concept of the “space-time representation” noted in the module resources? For your answer, think about location information that could tracked and displayed with associated date information. Go back to the references linked above, and include at least one APA in-text citation within your answer to justify your response based on the articles linked in this module.

ITEM 3, new visualizations (2 points): If Mallory did incorporate a space-time (i.e., location-date) component to her 3D Maps, what fields could she add to the Excel workbook, and how do you recommend she use them when developing new visualizations? For your answer, think about Mallory’s goals in the case study.

ITEM 4, references (2 points): Include the references in APA format that match the APA in-text citations from ITEMS 1-3.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow UWF Water Quality in the Indian River Lagoon Case Study

UWF Water Quality in the Indian River Lagoon Case Study

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!