Legal Analysis of Negligence in Liebeck v McDonald’s Restaurants

Legal Analysis of Negligence in Liebeck v McDonald’s Restaurants

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

 Legal Analysis of Negligence in Liebeck v McDonald’s Restaurants

I would like you to analyze/break down/summarize the following case Liebeck v McDonald’s Restaurants in terms of the Big Issue, Duty of Care, Standard of Care, Causation, Remoteness, Damages, Defences, and Conclusion/Advice.

You break it down by asking and answering the questions on the first page of the part of the ‘Torts Handout’ titled ‘Negligence’.

The information about the case you need (what happened in the case) can be found in a video on youtube.com: Woman Burned by McDonald’s Hot Coffee, Retro Report, The New York Times.

For a little written about the case check out: Liebeck v McDonald’s Restaurants h2o.law.harvard.edu

What Is a Hostile Work Environment in California Discussion

Prepare an outline of the topic based upon your legal research

Submit the 3-page abstract writing assignment that consists of a cover page, an abstract (this is essentially an executive summary of the hypothetical 5-8 page paper) and a bibliography that contains at least 5 academic sources in APA format.

CSU Alternative Remedy in Supreme Court Ruling Upholding the Ban on Robocall PPT

Robocall Ban Upheld, Broadend by Supreme Court in Free-Speech Case

 

5-10 minutes presentation with 3 student and I am the 4th student.

 

Professor:Students will be assigned to groups of 4 to work on a project involving a recent 2020 Supreme Court decision. Each group will be assigned a different Supreme Court decision to analyze. Following analysis of the case, groups will prepare questions and answers to lead a class discussion. All students will be required to come to class on the day of the discussion having read an article I will assign on the Supreme Court decision. Articles can be found on top. This will prepare everyone to participate in the discussion. Class discussion should be no longer than 5-10 minutes. You may use powerpoints, videos, etc to lead your group’s discussion.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Legal Analysis of Negligence in Liebeck v McDonald’s Restaurants

Legal Analysis of Negligence in Liebeck v McDonald’s Restaurants

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!