CRC 345 Economics the Sortino Ratio Discussion

CRC 345 Economics the Sortino Ratio Discussion

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

CRC 345 Economics the Sortino Ratio Discussion

I’m stuck on a Economics question and need an explanation.

Read the above article about the Sortino ratio. In your opinion which is the better ratio: Sortino ratio or Sharpe ratio? Provide some examples to support your opinion. Frank Sortino, who created the one measure, thinks that both measures are bad ways to pick stocks. What do you think? [Note: it’s ok to agree or disagree with him.] Can you think of reasons why these might not be good ways to pick stocks?  Y

Financial Markets Questions

Q1. Write a brief reflection (1-2 paragraphs) on your relationship to financial markets. Address the following: (Note that the main point is to reflect on your own relationship to financial markets and to use the class material from this week.)

In what sense are you a saver and/or borrower?

Do you use an intermediary (as a saver or borrower) or not?

What function does the intermediary have? (if you use one)

Optional: Do you use a specific trading platform you want to share? (Note that a trading platform is not considered a “financial intermediary.” Why not?)

About writings in DB:

I have set it up so that you will share a writing space with a group of 8 students (including yourself). (Hopefully, I set it up correctly.)

Share whatever you are comfortable sharing and want to talk about (get feedback on or just reflect on). You don’t need to share things about your personal financial situation that you are not comfortable sharing. You can also come up with hypothetical scenarios of where you picture you will be in the future.

Q2.If you were to buy a used car, how would you go about it? Would you go through Carmax or some other intermediary, or would you try to connect directly to someone who is selling their own used car? How could going through an intermediary be helpful? If you don’t feel you need one, why not? (Think Asymmetric Information: The seller probably knows more about the car than you do.)

Q3. Various government agencies regulate and oversee what banks do. There are many regulations on what banks are allowed to do (ex: limits on what assets banks can hold, how much capital they need to hold, what it takes to start your own bank etc.).

Paragraph 1: Describe ONE such regulation. (Many are described in the video (PPs) on Regulations) Find one regulation that looks interesting to you and describe it briefly.

Paragraph 2: Explain how this regulation can reduce Asymmetric Information or the consequences of AI. (The point here is: WHY do we have regulations? How does the particular regulation you have described help?)

 

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow CRC 345 Economics the Sortino Ratio Discussion

CRC 345 Economics the Sortino Ratio Discussion

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!