Digital Forensics and Investigations Discussion Essay

Digital Forensics and Investigations Discussion Essay

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Digital Forensics and Investigations Discussion Essay

instructions
1. Read the case “Sagasco Holding Limited” in the case packet and briefly respond to the case

question(s) below.

2. You are welcome to discuss the case as a group, but each person must write their own response.

Responses that are identical will not receive credit.

3. Please submit your write-up online to CANVAS prior to the class in which we discuss the case.
4. Please limit your write-up to one page, single-spaced, 11pt font.

Based on your reading of the case, respond concisely to the following question(s):

(a) Is it appropriate to think of all of Australia as a single geographic market for natural gas? If

so, explain why. If not, how would you define the relevant geographic market(s)?

(b) Based on your geographic market definition(s) above, would you expect the Santos /

SAGASCO merger to increase market power?

(c) Should regulators be concerned that Santos / SAGASCO would have a controlling share of

the Moomba processing facility? Why or why not?

Reading and example attached.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Digital Forensics and Investigations Discussion Essay

Digital Forensics and Investigations Discussion Essay

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!