Davis Sortino Ratio and Constitutional Rights Essay

Davis Sortino Ratio and Constitutional Rights Essay

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Davis Sortino Ratio and Constitutional Rights Essay

Read the above article about the Sortino ratio. In your opinion which is the better ratio: Sortino ratio or Sharpe ratio? Provide some examples to support your opinion. Frank Sortino, who created the one measure, thinks that both measures are bad ways to pick stocks. What do you think? [Note: it’s ok to agree or disagree with him.] Can you think of reasons why these might not be good ways to pick stocks?  You do not need to address all these questions; they are merely suggestions to get you to think about the issues.

Constitutional Rights Essay

Assignment 3: Constitutional Rights

Research, review and analyze Korb v. Raytheon, 707 F.Supp. 63 (D.Mass. 1989). Based on your research and the case, write a 5-6 page paper in which you:

Analyze and evaluate each case independently by providing the following (about two paragraphs per case):

Facts of the case

Issues

Rule

Analyze and explain the challenges with freedom of speech.

Analyze and explain any challenges with freedom of information.

Analyze and explain any challenges with employment law.

Analyze and discuss the public perceptions of Raytheon and its influence with the Department of Defense.

Analyze and discuss any fraud or misrepresentation on either side of the case.

Briefly describe at least four (4) additional court cases that support your analysis.These cases must be cited and referenced in APA format.

 

Recommend how the legal system addresses critical issues faced by public officials to include freedom of the press, funding of government contracts, separation of church and state, public ethics law, hiring lawyers, and handling civil litigation.

Evaluate legal subjects relevant to public administration to include property, government contracts, employment, and torts.

Relate the administrative process, constitutional and statutory requirements, to the scope of judicial review of administrative agency decisions.

Assess legal decisions related to the administration of public goods.

Use technology and information resources to research issues in constitution and administrative law.

Write clearly and concisely about issues in constitution and administrative law using proper writing mechanics.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Davis Sortino Ratio and Constitutional Rights Essay

Davis Sortino Ratio and Constitutional Rights Essay

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!