Economics China and Bank Bailouts Discussion
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Economics China and Bank Bailouts Discussion
I don’t understand this Economics question and need help to study.
Read the article about China and bank bailouts. You do not need to address all of the following but here are some things to think about. What is the moral hazard issue being described in the article about Chinese banks? Do you think there are any adverse selection issues as well? Why or why not? The article mentions that there may be more mergers and acquisitions involving smaller banks in China. What are the pros and cons of this for the banking system in China? The article also mentions shadow financing (shadow banking) as an issue. Give your opinion, does shadow banking help or harm the Chinese banking system and the overall Chinese economy?
Podcast Paper
Listen to Podcast on Millennium Villages: http://www.econtalk.org/archives/2014/01/nina_munk_on_po.html (Links to an external site.)
Reflection on Podcast (500-750 words, minimum of 1 paragraph per question)
What do you think about the idea of Millennium Villages? Were they a good idea? Why or why not?
How would you rate their effectiveness? On what basis?
What ethical considerations should people developing programs to fight poverty consider?
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Economics China and Bank Bailouts Discussion
Economics China and Bank Bailouts Discussion