Current Review 3 In Magazines Relating To Public Policy

Current Review 3 In Magazines Relating To Public Policy

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Current Review 3 In Magazines Relating To Public Policy

Paper details: There is a lot of information online, in magazines and newspapers relating to public policy, local governments, and more.

However, some of the news articles are not always accurate or are based on faulty research or resources.

As individuals, it is up to us to analyze what we read in order to decide if we believe or disbelieve the validity of the article.

For each article summary: First find ONE article in any current magazine or newspaper or online.

They have to be current articles, in the sense that they must be published &/or written in the last year.

They also must be related to the class in some way, from US Supreme Court Decisions, laws passed by the New Jersey Legislature, laws passed by the US Congress/Senate, ordinances passed by the town you live in, or information regarding the Governors policies or things he may be trying to accomplish – so this is a wide scope of information.

These articles are not to be research articles because the focus of this assignment is to look and evaluate what the general public is reading.

Read the article and analyze the contents of the article.

For each article you are to provide the following write up: Publication Information: Title of article, author, and publication source

(CITATION OF ARTICLE) Summarize the article in your own words: including basic facts and information provided in 8-10 Sentences.

Analyze the article in your own words: pick apart the information and evaluate it in the context of if you think it is accurate and reliable and how it affects you or other individuals in 8-10 Sentences.

Reflection of the article: What societal impact does this article have?

How would it affect the readers, regardless of if they analyze it or not?

What impact does it have on your perspective of state and local government?

And any other questions that you think of when reading the article in 8-10 Sentences.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Current Review 3 In Magazines Relating To Public Policy

Current Review 3 In Magazines Relating To Public Policy

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!