Access To Healthcare Information Technology In The Process
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Access To Healthcare Information Technology In The Process
Paper details: Describe how Race/ethnicity, gender, sex, education, socioeconomic status and age influence our access to healthcare.
Please involve information technology in the process.
Please I will need this to be completed by the 12th of this month (December).
While writing the research paper, you should:
- Summarize some basic descriptive statistics in a table–percentage, mean, total score, scale means, internal reliability or whatever is appropriate for the survey (Results),
- Use data visualizations,
- Analyze, interpret, and summarize the findings derived from the data in a narrative form (Results),
- Discuss your findings and make a conclusion regarding what the survey revealed, (Discussion and Conclusion),
- State the implications of your survey’s results (usually a subheading in the Discussion and Conclusion section), and,
- Present your final project.
I have attached here the annotated bibliography I used.
Feel free to use those articles if you want.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Access To Healthcare Information Technology In The Process
Access To Healthcare Information Technology In The Process