BSHA program Criminal Law Essay Discussion

BSHA program Criminal Law Essay Discussion

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

BSHA program Criminal Law Essay Discussion

As you conclude the BSHA program, it is important to reflect on the knowledge gained and your experiences throughout your program.

Write a 175- to 350-word reflection of your experience in the BSHA program and explain your role in the health care industry. Include answers to the following questions in your reflection:

Considering all of the courses and content you have learned in the program, what course or course content will be most helpful in your future role?

How will you apply the knowledge you have gained during this program to the role you aspire to obtain in the health care industry?

What you did not learn and how do you think it would have supported your education and your future career?

Submit your assignment.

Qualitative Research Methods Research Paper

Combine your Interview Protocol and Observational Guide into 1 cohesive document. Incorporate your instructor’s feedback into the final draft.

Part 1: Interview Protocol (4–6 pages)

Central guiding research question

Target population and sampling plan

Include estimated size of final sample

Type of interview with rationale

Semi structured

Responsive

Narrative

Format and schedule of interview questions

Main questions

Follow-up questions

Probes

Neutral prompts

Planned location and estimated length of interview process

Plans for the following:

Recording and transcription

Field notes

Proposed analysis model and detailed plan for establishing reliability of your coding process outcomes

Cite the methodologist

Part 2: Observational Guide (4–6 pages)

Central guiding research question

Target group and setting

Investigator relationship to the target group and setting

Consider the available sources of data (social actions, talk, archival records, etc.).

List and organize the anticipated puzzlements and jottings

List 2–3 specific observations that you will need to make.

List 3–4 main questions to guide your conversation with individuals.

Include 1–2 probes for each main question.

What archival records will you seek?

Description of the planned structure and format for recording your field notes

Proposed analysis model and a detailed plan for the presentation of your observational results

Cite the methodologist

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow BSHA program Criminal Law Essay Discussion

BSHA program Criminal Law Essay Discussion

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!