Care Coordination Clinical Reasoning Model for Hypertension Question

Care Coordination Clinical Reasoning Model for Hypertension Question

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Care Coordination Clinical Reasoning Model for Hypertension Question

Begin by identifying a patient from your clinicals who has a chronic health condition such as diabetes, COPD, hypertension, mental health diagnosis, and post stroke care. Discuss all aspects of healthcare coordination with the chosen diagnosis. Your paper should include the following information:

Description of the patient’s health issues, diagnoses, and treatment plan.

Description of the interdisciplinary team that will participate in this care.

Can the CCCR model be used in managing this patient’s care? How so? If not, can you name another model to help in managing this patient’s care?

What is the cost of managing this disease? Are there resources available for the patient and family to help with costs and other factors such as commute and etc?

What is your role as the APRN in this team?

As the APRN, how can you evaluate if the care management is successful?

As the APRN, how can you evaluate if this patient needs a higher level of care?

Are there any barriers or challenges that you foresee for this patient? How can you overcome these barriers?

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Care Coordination Clinical Reasoning Model for Hypertension Question

Care Coordination Clinical Reasoning Model for Hypertension Question

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!