- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@crucialessay.com
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Healthcare Precede Proceed Model Research Paper
Explain the key components and constructs of the PRECEDE-PROCEED Model and the steps involved in the intervention mapping approach. Describe an example of how each of these models have been applied in public health practice. What similarities and differences exist between the intervention mapping and PRECEDE-PROCEED models? Which approach do you favor and why?
PLEASE ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS ABOVE AND MAKE IT COHESIVE AND TRY TO INCORPORATE THE READINGS BELOW
PLEASE add the links/sites below to the reference list if you use any of these readings and make sure everything is in proper APA format.
https://apastyle.apa.org/learn/quick-guide-on-refe…
Read Chapter 16, 18, and 19 in Health Behavior: Theory, Research, and Practice .
URL:
Read “Section 2. PRECEDE/PROCEED” in Chapter 2 of the Community Tool Box website.
URL:
Read “Factors Facilitating the Implementation of Church-Based Heart Health Promotion Programs for Older Adults: A Qualitative Study Guided by the Precede-Proceed Model,” by Banerjee, Kin, Strachan, Boyle, Anand, and Oremus, from American Journal of Health Promotion (2015).
URL:
Read “Healthy and Productive Workers: Using Intervention Mapping to Design a Workplace Health Promotion and Wellness Program to Improve Presenteeism ” by Ammendolia et al., from BMC Public Health (2016).
URL:
Read “Intervention Mapping to Adapt Evidence-Based Interventions for Use in Practice: Increasing Mammography Among African American Women,” by Highfield, Hartman, Mullen, Rodriguez, Fernandez, and Bartholomew, from Biomed Research International (2015).
URL:
Read “Examining the Diet of Post-Migrant Hispanic Males Using the Precede-Proceed Model: Predisposing, Reinforcing, and Enabling Dietary Factors,” by Cuy Castellanos, Downey, Graham-Kresge, Yadrick, Zoellner, and Connell, from Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (2013).
URL:
MUST have at least three citations with the page numbers and three references in APA format and all questions clearly answered in paragraphs.(The List of References should not be older than 2016 and should not be included in the word count.)
Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources.
It is important that you cover all the topics identified in the assignment. Covering the topic does not mean mentioning the topic BUT presenting an explanation from the context of ethics and the readings for this class
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
