Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

A Retrospective Cohort Study Essay Discussion

I need an explanation for this Health & Medical question to help me study.

Comment this

I especially found what you said about what/who decides what is best for the patient to be very interesting. On one hand the patient should be granted autonomy to make their own decisions, however as you mentioned, if they are opting for an option that may put their life in danger this can be a controversial and difficult situation for health care personnel. You mentioned the importance of educating the patient and making sure they are of sound mind to make a decision. This is at the core of autonomy.

I believe that if the patient has been educated and is of sound mind, then they should be able to choose what they believe is right for them. Often, this can be difficult if we believe differently and are involved in the care for this patient. As stated in The Four Principles of Biomedical Ethics, “autonomy minimally requires the ability to decide for the self-free from the control of others and with sufficient level of understanding as to provide for meaningful choice…

This creates problems in the delivery of health care, especially when patients are comatose, incompetent (whether due to age- i.e., children, or to mental ability) or, for example, imprisoned.” What are your thoughts on these difficult situations regarding autonomy?

 

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

 

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!