- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@crucialessay.com
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
AHS 7615 Monetary and Non-Monetary Ways Discussion
Name two (2) monetary and two (2) non-monetary ways that faith-based organizations cultivate support to carry out human services. Name two (2) potential benefits of faith-based organizations accepting government (public) funds (grants). What ways would you suggest faith-based organizations use to raise money to support their services?
ARTICLES:
Funding and Faith: Research about Faith-Based Organizations and Initiatives
The Z. Smith Reynolds Foundation retained OpenSource Leadership Strategies, Inc. to conduct research about the federal Faith-Based Initiative to help inform its grantmaking to faith-based organizations. This report provides an overview of the history and structure of faith-based initiatives, the distinct characteristics of faith-based organizations, a chart summarizing intermediaries and capacity builders, and examples from other states and other funders.
By: OpenSource Leadership Strategies, Inc., 2004Guidance for Faith-Based Organizations on Fundraising and Support Strategies
This article serves as a guide for faith-based organizations on fundraising and support strategies.
By: Faith and Organizations Project, 2010This article reports selected findings from a qualitative case study of two faith-based social service organizations to address how government funding influences the religious characteristics of faith-based social service organizations, and how government-funded, faith-based social service organizations manage the tensions that may arise from both secular and religious contexts.
By: James R. Vanderwoerd, 2004CASE STUDY: FROM BURDEN TO BLESSING
This case study is about a faith-based organization that revisited its mission and reassessed its relationships within the community it served, in order to create a new funding paradigm and service-delivery model.
By: Samuel MahaffyCASE STUDY: THE IMPACT OF ACCEPTING GOVERNMENT FUNDS ON A FAITH-BASED ORGANIZATION
This case study explores the impact of accepting government funds on a faith-based organization.
By: Brian J. Eggers, University of Puget Sound, 2008
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
