Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

SCI 201 Assessing Reliability and Credibility of CAM Resources

As you do your research about CAM, it is vital to establish what information is credible and reliable. By the time you complete this assignment you should have made some decisions about the credibility and reliability of information related to CAM. Assignment
Create a 14- to 16-slide (including introduction, conclusion, and reference slides) presentation (Microsoft® PowerPoint®, Prezi, etc.) that provides guidance for assessing credibility and reliability of an online source about CAM information.
Directions: Select a CAM therapy or modality different from the one you selected in Week 1 or 2 and do research for information about this therapy or modality. Using the five objective criteria you created above, provide a review on one of the websites you found in your search and evaluate the reliability and credibility of the information it presents on CAM. Include detailed speaker notes (75 word minimum) in a separate Word document for all slides except title, introduction, conclusion, references).Ensure you include at least one slide for each of the following:

Title

Introduction

Briefly describe the CAM therapy or modality – What it treats and how it works (2 slides)

Create five objective criteria to evaluate the credibility and reliability of a source of information on CAM.

Discuss how you arrived at each criterion and how it can help assess reliability of source information. (2 slides)

Using the five objective criteria you created above, provide a review on one of the websites you found in your search on the CAM and evaluate the reliability and credibility of the information it presents on CAM. (2 slides)

Explain how the website met or did not meet each of the criterion you created.

Describe how a consumer’s attitudes and beliefs about CAM could affect the assessment of reliability and credibility of source information about CAM.

Explain whether using credible sources addresses/changes incorrect personal attitudes, feelings and beliefs about CAM.

Include Conclusion slide.

Reference slide – APA format

Include detailed speaker notes for each slide except title, introduction, conclusion, references.

Compile your speaker’s notes in a Word document identifying them by slide number.
Present the Assessing Reliability and Credibility of CAM Resources Presentation according to your campus enrollment listed below:

For Online and Directed Study students: a visual presentation with a speaker notes document

 

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

 

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!