Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Health and Medical Ethics in Medical Practice Essay

Must own intervention & reflection: basic issues in bioethics. Do not bid if you don’t own this book!

You will submit an essay synthesizing course readings and outside research into an articulate and cogent response to the following question: are there occasions in the delivery of health care when deception is warranted?

Must read:

Munson: Chapter 3, pages 253 – 296

Based on your reading of the textbook, Scripture, and additional sources:

Review the following scenarios of medical deception provided and rank them with commentary regarding appropriate behavior (most appropriate to  least appropriate):

A physician intentionally submits faulty information to an insurance company in an attempt to help a sick patient pay for needed healthcare services.

A physician recognizes the  patient has psychosomatic symptoms and prescribes a placebo pill in  hopes that the emotional relief of the placebo will help the patient  recover (thus saving the patient from possible treatments which would be  more invasive and/or extensive).

A physician does not provide  full disclosure of a surgical procedure because he/she suspects the  patient is not emotionally stable enough to handling all the details of  the surgery, treatment and recovery.

Review the following scenarios and rank them with commentary regarding a physician’s ethics (most ethical to least ethical):

Physicians accept pharmaceutical perks if they recommend a specific drug for treatment.

When  prescribing pain medication, some physicians may “undertreat” a patient  if they sense their patient may have a propensity for addiction.

A  physician treating a patient with a terminal illness fails to disclose  secondary ailments/diseases which may arise (in an attempt to protect  the patient’s emotional stability and will to fight).

Recount  occasions from your personal life experiences of being lied to/misled  by a health care clinician and, in retrospect, comment on the  correctness of this decision.

Provide a rationale (in terms of  biblical commandments, guidelines, or inferences) on whether or not a  Christian clinician should deceive a patient.

 

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

 

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!