Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
UWF M8 Data Visualization Using Excel 3 D Maps Paper
Demonstrate proficiency with data visualization using the 3D Maps feature in Microsoft Excel
Access Microsoft Excel
Resources:
First, use the resource above to familiarize yourself with how to access Microsoft Excel at UWF.
NOTE: To complete the 3D Maps assignments in this course, you will need to access a Windows version of Excel (version 2016 or higher).
WATCH AND LEARN HELPFUL VIDEOS FOR ARGOAPPS USERS:
Transferring Excel files to ArgoApps (Links to an external site.)
Practice with creating 3D maps in Microsoft Excel
Resources:
Excel-3DMaps-Intro-Practice.docx
Next, if you are new to data visualization features in Microsoft Excel, use the practice exercises provided to create some basic maps. Step-by-step guidance is provided.
These practices exercises are an important use of your time – completing them will help you meet the requirements in the assignment below.
WATCH AND LEARN HELPFUL VIDEOS FOR PRACTICE (Using Pizza Data)
Creating a 3D map (Links to an external site.)
3D Maps: Plotting with stacked columns (Links to an external site.)
3D Maps: Plotting with bubbles (Links to an external site.)
Creating a data tour in Excel (Links to an external site.)
Finishing touches for data tour (Links to an external site.)
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow