Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

DOC 714S Remote Working Proposed Dissertation

Part 1
Content

This week you will build on the Prospectus Template you submitted in the Wk 6 – Prospectus: Problem and Purpose Statements assignment. You will do this by identifying and placing in the prospectus the research question(s) and method and design you will use to address your problem and purpose, based on the feedback received from the peer reviews.
Complete the following under the corresponding Prospectus Template sections that you submitted in the Wk 6 – Prospectus: Problem and Purpose Statements assignment:

Sections 1, 2, and 3: Incorporate all revisions from previous feedback.

Section 6: Research Methodology (Proposed Method and Design):

Method: Write 1 paragraph describing the research method you identified and 1 paragraph justifying why the methodology is appropriate.

Design: Write 1 paragraph describing the research design you identified and 1 paragraph justifying why the design is appropriate.

Section 6: Research Questions/Hypotheses: State the research question(s) and hypotheses, if applicable

Part 2 Discussion

Student Responses: Review the classmates’ posts and respond to at least one in a minimum of 150 words.? Explain why you agree or disagree. Then, share an example from your professional experience to support your assertions.

Hello everyone,

Program of Study: Doctor of Management

Problem Statement: The problem is decreased morale among employees within the auto industry. Often times, employees do not feel appreciated, the overall morale is low and they do not feel inspired.

Purpose Statement: The purpose of this study is to explore ways to retain employees at the Sterling Heights assembly plant, and to make the work place more enjoyable.

he purpose of this study is to explore ways to retain employees and to make the work place more enjoyable.

Revised Research Methodology: The proposed method and design will be qualitative as it would mainly rely on the emotional insight, responses, and case studies. The proposed method and design will be qualitative as it would mainly rely on the emotional insight, responses, and case studies (Merriam, 1998). The research method that I will be using is Action Research, specifically PAR which stands for Participative action research. This will involve me and the employees coming together to discuss as well as solve organizational issues.

Research Questions:

What company do you work for?

What is your current occupation/position at work?

What are some of the things that you dislike about your job?

What are some things that you do like about your job?

What are some things that the company could do to make the job more enjoyable?

What incentives would you like to see implemented that would boost morale?

Does your company currently have any incentives?

What are some things that management can do to improve the work environment?

In your opinion, how do you feel you are treated by your leadership?

Do you think you have a good work-life balance?

In regard to the work-life balance, why do you feel that you do or don’t have it?

Would you like to provide any additional feedback?

References:

Altschuld, J. W., & Kumar, D. D. (2010). Needs assessment: An overview. (Vols. 1-1). SAGE Publications, Inc., https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452256795

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

How Some Companies Are Getting Creative To Keep Their Employees Happy. (2022).

Kane, L. (2004). Staff benefits that won’t cost a bundle: even small offices can keep employees happy and still hold down costs. Here’s how. Medical Economics, 81(5), 96.

James, E. A., & Slater T. (2014). Writing your doctoral dissertation or thesis faster: A proven map to success. SAGE Publications. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781506374727

Mindset Expert Explains the Simple Reason Why Half the World’s Employees Are Unhappy At Work. (2018, October 2). M2 Presswire.

Sleezer, C. M., Russ-Eft, D. F., & Gupta, K. (2014). A practical guide to needs assessment. Center for Creative Leadership.

The Great Resignation: How to Keep Employees Happy and Prevent Burnout. (2021, October 1). CPA Practice Advisor.

Why Do Unhappy Employees Stay? “Job Embeddedness” Factors Can Impact the Decision. (2016, February 2). States News Service.

Edited by Amber Love on Aug 19, 2022, 12:10:30 AM

 

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

 

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!