NRP 555 Health Promotion and Maintenance Plan Presentation
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
NRP 555 Health Promotion and Maintenance Plan Presentation
Develop a 10-slide health promotion and maintenance plan using Microsoft® PowerPoint® which outlines strategies that will increase patient compliance with treatment plans.
Address the following questions in your plan:
When is it an appropriate time to educate the patient and their family members about the plan of care?
Explain how the NP can guarantee that the patient has the resources they need to comply with the treatment plan.
How will you properly monitor follow-ups with the patient?
In your role as a NP, what is your plan for patients experiencing non-emergent yet concerning symptoms?
What methods can be used to increase health promotion and maintenance for patients and the community?
As an NP, what is your plan for reducing unnecessary readmission of patients?
What methods of communication can be used to bridge gaps between other physicians and services?
How can you integrate cultural preferences, values, health beliefs, and behaviors into the treatment plan utilizing Watson’s theory?
NRP 555 Health Promotion and Maintenance Plan Presentation
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow