Prescribed Drugs with CAMs Case Study
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Prescribed Drugs with CAMs Case Study
Case Study: Prescribed Drugs with CAMs
A 35-year-old male, Mr. NX, presents to your clinic today with complaints of back pain and “just not feeling good.” Regarding his back, he states that his back pain is a chronic condition that he has suffered with for about the last 10 years. He has not suffered any specific injury to his back. He denies weakness of the lower extremities, denies bowel or bladder changes or dysfunction, and denies radiation of pain to the lower extremities and no numbness or tingling of the lower extremities. He describes the pain as a constant dull ache and tightness across the low back.
He states he started a workout program about 3 weeks ago. He states he is working out with a friend who is a body builder. He states his friend suggested taking Creatine to help build muscle and Coenzyme Q10 as an antioxidant so he started those medications at the same time he began working out. He states he also takes Kava Kava for his anxiety and garlic to help lower his blood pressure.
His historical diagnoses, currently under control, are:
Type II diabetes since age 27
High blood pressure
Recurrent DVTs
His prescribed medications include:
Glyburide 3 mg daily with breakfast
Lisinopril 20 mg daily
Coumadin 5 mg daily
Directions:
Present this Assignment as a PowerPoint presentation with at least 10 slides
Be sure to complete the assignment as the NP treating this family, not as a third party.
You will use the Narrative notes section of the presentation to include the majority of your evidentiary support of your treatment choices and education of family complete with in-text citations using APA formatting, remember if you use photos from outside sources, they must be cited below within the Power Point.
Be sure to complete the assignment as the NP treating this family, not as a third party
Create a COMMUNICATION PLAN (how patient is going to carry out treatment, not the same as a treatment plan) for mother and child for both prescriptive and non-prescriptive drug therapies.
You will create a treatment plan for pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic intervention. For any medications you would use, you must provide rational for your choice including discussion of kinetics and dynamics of the drugs.
LINK TO BOOK
Pharmacotherapeutics for NP Prescribers
Chapter 8: “An Introduction to Pharmacogenomics”
Chapter 10: “Herbal and Nutritional Supplements”
Chapter 13: “Over-the-counter Medications”
PLEASE READ EVERYTHING CAREFULLY. MAKE SURE TO FOLLOW POST AS WELL AS RUBRIC. NO PLAGIARISM WILL BE ACCEPTED
149
Information System Change Healthcare Informatics
***Biedermann, S. and Dolezel, D. (2017) Introduction to Healthcare Informatics (2nd Edition). Chicago: AHIMA Press. ISBN-13: 978-1-58426-528-3***
Overview
Important groundwork has to be done ahead of any information system change in a healthcare organization. Information system change is an opportunity to revise or develop a coherent model of how information will flow and be used throughout an organization. It is also a good time to review and consider additional key security components, particularly as healthcare organizations grow through merger and acquisition. In this assignment, you will respond to the questions below to develop your understanding of some of these important considerations.
You may use course materials and other sources to develop your answers. The purpose of the assignment is two-fold:
To help you understand some of the information infrastructure in use today.
To help develop your ability to see HIT in the context of the healthcare organization
This is an individual assignment and your work is expected to be your own.
Specific Requirements
Please respond to the questions below. You can start with your course materials and reach out to other trusted resources as needed. Please remember that while we all love it, Wikipedia is not considered a trusted or scholarly resources. Also, please be sure to explore the questions in an appropriate level of detail given the Evaluation Criteria. A short answer will not be worth 20 points.
Describe the term Architectural Models and give an example of a modeling approach a growing healthcare organization could consider using. Explain why you think the model you recommend would be a good fit. (pg 107)
Define Mobile Computing and describe one benefit and one challenge an organization would experience if they decide to integrate Mobile Computing in their Architectural Model. Also discuss one legal concern they would face. (pg 112)
As a part of implementing an Architectural Model, a Firewall can help protect an organization. Explain what a Firewall is and what purposes it would serve for an organization. Also describe what its main functions are.
As a part of implementing an Architectural Model, a VPN can help protect an organization. Explain what a VPN is and what purposes it would serve for an organization? Also, describe how a VPN would work with Mobile Computing. (pgs 118-9)
Define Cloud Computing and describe one benefit and one challenge an organization would experience if they decide to integrate Cloud Computing in their Architectural Model Also describe one NIST established essential Cloud Computing characteristic that you feel is important for an organization to consider and why.
Assignment Organizational and Formatting Guidelines
On the title page of your report please put your name, the course number and the following honor pledge: “On my honor as a student I swear that I have neither given or received assistance on this assignment.”
Each report should demonstrate scholarly writing and use of appropriate references and in-text citations. You will need at a MINIMUM of 5 references from course materials and scholarly sources for this assignment. The in-text citation and reference formatting should conform to the specifications in the publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.).
Logical flow, clarity of presentation, correct grammatical structure, and correct spelling should be evident throughout. The paper should be proofread and free of typographical errors. Don’t forget that spell check doesn’t always work for correctly spelled words that are a mistake in a sentence.
The length of each paper should be between 3-4 pages, typed in a 12-point font. Length refers to the text and does not include the title page or the reference pages. Use one-inch margins top, bottom, left, and right. Use double-spacing only. Do not make lists in the paper; write in paragraph form, using the guidelines for seriating in the APA manual. Do not use quotes, unless for definitions or particular emphasis; paraphrase instead. Use third person, not first (I, we, etc is not acceptable). Write objectively, not subjectively. Express your professional opinion based on fact.
Please use only the questions given above as headings for your paper. Subheadings should be used for each individual question.
You may use course materials and other sources to develop your answers.
Prescribed Drugs with CAMs Case Study
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow