Los Angeles The Korean War Discussion Questions

Los Angeles The Korean War Discussion Questions

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Los Angeles The Korean War Discussion Questions

1. This week, you can earn three (3) extra points toward your participation grade by completing the following prompt:

Choose one event listed on our timeline (Links to an external site.), date it, explain it, and situate it on the correct place in our timeline. A full list of events can be found on the handout Download handout. You can choose any event but make sure that you don’t duplicate. Write at least one paragraph (minimum of 5 sentences, bullet points will not be accepted).

In your post, you can address the 5 Ws of the event: Who, What, When, Where, why. write 150 words around

2. Read: Anisakis Junichiro, Naomi

Discuss the jarring contrast between Ryan’s modernity and the one depicted by Tanoak in his novel. How do we reconcile the two?

3 Read: Sonia Rang, “The Great Kanto Earthquake and the Massacre of Koreans in 1923: Notes on Japan’s Modern National Sovereignty”

DISCUSS Why do you think Sonia Rang selected the concept of homo saucer in order to make sense of the 1923 massacre of 6,000 Korean people living in mainland Japan by a combination of police and vigilantes? How does the notion of the “unpacifiable Korean” help her make an argument about the nature of Japanese modernity?

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Los Angeles The Korean War Discussion Questions

Los Angeles The Korean War Discussion Questions

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!