Ebola Virus Discussion

Ebola Virus Discussion

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Ebola Virus Discussion

You will investigate a specific event in earth science that you personally find interesting. You will write 2 or 3 page paper about this event and present your findings during an assign class period.

the rough draft should be the first version of your completed paper. it should include citations and references.this step will not earn you and point, but is a valuable step in the writing process for those who take advantage.

I am thinking of EBOLA but anything is welcome

Skidmore College Pollution in the Chesapeake Bay discussion

Instructions for Annotated Bibliography

For your project, you need to develop content-area understanding of your case study or the context of your environmental organization during your service learning assignment.An annotated bibliography is a step in the research process just prior to a formal review of the literature: doing annotated bibliographies allows you to understand the range of types of research questions being asked about the issue, and allows you to get a sense of the findings of that research.

You are required to build an annotated bibliography of 30 sources. At least 20 of these sources need to come from peer review literature: the articles published in academic journals.Other kinds of sources include government documents (called white papers or grey literature: these are not all the time peer reviewed, but they are completed in a rigorous way by people trained in that field of study). You are not to use news sites, websites or videos when amassing your annotated bibliography.

Review the procedures on how to compose an annotated bibliography at the following website:

Next, head off to your library, or to your own laptops, to search databases. I often use google scholar to search for peer review work, but our college library has a number of databases that are useful depending on your topic.

At the top of your page, be sure to clearly identify your case study or organization context you are researching, and list the search terms you used in each of the databases you used (if you use more than one database, list each).

Be sure to adhere to the citation guidelines found on the POLS website:

MY Case Study is Pollution in the Chesapeake Bay

Rubric:

A:Student professionally presented their annotated work, organizing it logically (developing topics and alphabetizing within each topic), used mostly peer review sources, and chose entries that relate directly to their stated topic. Student annotation is not just cut-and-paste from abstracts, but put into the student’s own words.

B: Student professionally presented their annotated work, used mostly peer review sources, and mostly chose entries that clearly relate to their stated topic. Most of the annotations are phrased in the student’s own words.

C: Student completed the assignment, many of the entries come from peer review sources, and some of these entries will clearly relate to their stated topic. Student used a limited number of databases and search terms to explore the topic.

D:Student handed in the assignment but it was incomplete, the student cut-and-pasted the annotations directly from the abstracts of journal articles, and did not list the databases and search terms they explored. Many of the entries were only tangentially related to their case study or environmental organization.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Ebola Virus Discussion

Ebola Virus Discussion

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!