Lit Review Re Draft
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Lit Review Re Draft
I was wondering if we could continue to work together on this paper and editing it. It needs to atleast ten more sources and when you write these and synthesize you must use multiple sources for one statement most times. The draft we last completed used just single sources per statements and did not incorporate studies findings together. I am willing to work diligently with you over next two days in order to get this completed correctly and re draft it.
I have attached the previous draft as well. along with document 101 which will help with formatting. Would love to work with you again.
abstract writing for a research project- (geoprocessing/geo statistics)-
You have to come up with a topic that can be used for a GIS (geographic information system) research project.
Please check the attached ppts to get an idea about what the project will look like, this will require to look into geoprocessing/ geo statistics.
You only have to work on the Abstract, Background, Objective and Hypothesis
Please do think of a good topic which is very crucial, looking at the ppts you will get an idea about different topics and how to research on it.
Remember this is an GIS class (geoprocessing project) so mapping the data will be done so select the topic that can give ample information and data so that it will be easier for me to make the maps.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Lit Review Re Draft
Lit Review Re Draft