Warning Initiative and Intervention C-HIP Model Essay

Warning Initiative and Intervention C-HIP Model Essay

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Warning Initiative and Intervention C-HIP Model Essay

Submit your assignment, which required you to design a warning initiative or intervention as a means to enhance safety to curtail injuries and/or illnesses. The assignment should be submitted in APA format. Any graphics, figures, etc. should be included as Appendices. See the grading rubric prior to submission of your assignment.

You will need to select a particular product, chemical, hazard, task, etc. that you want to address within your workplace. If you are unable to perform this task in a workplace, select a product, chemical, hazard, task that is applicable to a specific population (gasoline – general public, radon – homeowners, magnets – parents of young children, etc.).

You will use the C-HIP Model to develop your warning initiative or intervention. You must provide details for each aspect of the model. You must detail the intervention or initiative that you intend to develop and you must provide justification. This should be done for all aspects of the model. Thus, you should discuss and justify the source of the risk information and you should detail the media and channel as to how the warning will be presented and why (justify).

You need to address all aspects of the receiver. In your justification be sure to incorporate theoretical concepts and principles from the content learned in the module associated with sensation, perception, and information processing. Lastly, discuss the intended behavior that should be produced from the initiative or intervention.

After this information is presented, you should detail a strategy as to how you plan to evaluate your initiative or intervention. You should address process evaluation, impact evaluation, and outcome evaluation within your evaluation plan (this may require some additional research as to what should be included in these evaluation measures). The following sources will provide guidance as to definitions for the types of evaluations and items that need to be assessed in each aspect of the evaluation.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Warning Initiative and Intervention C-HIP Model Essay

Warning Initiative and Intervention C-HIP Model Essay

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!