The presentation style and quality of graphics

The presentation style and quality of graphics

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

The presentation style and quality of graphics

I’m getting so overwhelmed with assignments on my courses. if you could please help me with these:

  Speaker name and institutional affiliation; seminar title and date of presentation.

  3 Key Points: (3 key point sentences, each of length 140 characters) Key Points convey the

main points and conclusions of the seminar presentation. Write three (3) Key Point statements,

with each limited to at most 140 characters with no abbreviations. Key Points should be listed

as bullet points.

  Technical summary: (300 word limit) Summarize the work presented in as much technical

detail as you can within a limit of not more than 300 words. This technical summary should

provide more information to expand upon the information conveyed in the Key Points. The

technical summary should focus on the content of the talk, and not (for example) the

presentation style or quality of graphics. The technical summary must be your own summary of

the work. In the technical summary, it is appropriate to include up to 5 citations to the relevant

literature (References Cited does not count toward the word limit). These citations could be

those of the speaker’s own publications or those of other authors. Generally, these citations will

be provided by the speaker in their talk.

  References Cited: Provide up to 5 references that were used in the technical summary (no

word limit, but not more than 5 citations).

  Plain Language Summary: (200 word limit) A Plain Language Summary (PLS) is now required

for many scientific journals. We will follow the AGU journal guidelines (see link in the footnote

above) for the PLS format. A PLS is intended for science communication to a broad audience.

The PLS is intended to summarize the research in non-technical terms, allowing you to explain

the research and its relevance to a much broader audience. As it says on the AGU website “A

PLS should be no longer than 200 words and should be free of jargon, acronyms, equations,

and any technical information that would be unknown to people from outside your scientific

discipline.” For more information and tips on how to prepare a PLS, please see:

Word and character limits as detailed above will be strictly enforced. Due to the large enrollment, late

work cannot be accepted. Please plan your time well. You are encouraged to submit your work early.

Reports must be written clearly and employ correct grammar and spelling. Written reports that do not

meet standards or do not adhere to the format described above will be processed as follows: (1) For

Assignment #1 submissions that do not meet writing standards or follow the format guidelines, the

report will be returned to you for revision; you will have one week to revise your submission. (2) For

Assignment #2 submissions that do not follow the format guidelines, the report will receive a score of zero (since there is not enough time at the end of the quarter to allow revisions). If you are unsure about the format requirements, please contact Prof. Porter with any questions.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow The presentation style and quality of graphics

The presentation style and quality of graphics

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!