Agriculture Documentary Schedule Paper Discussion
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Agriculture Documentary Schedule Paper Discussion
Watch a food or agriculture documentary. You may choose from the following list or select one of your own.
Cowspiracy
King Corn
Forks over Knives
Food Inc.
Ingredients: the local food movement takes root
More than Honey
Farmageddon
GROW – a film about local food movement in Georgia
Vanishing of the Bees
Vegucated
Sustainable
Fresh
Just Eat It (Food Waste)
Food Matters
Eating Alabama
What the Health
Symphony of the Soil
In Defense of Food
Wasted! The Story of Food Waste
A Place at the TableFarmland
Fed Up
SEED: the Untold Story
Please contact me right away if it is not possible for you to access any appropriate food/ag videos and we will work out an alternative.
Provide the following information:
Part A (approximately 1 pg. double spaced)
- Movie title and link to film online
- Summary of the film in your own words (NOT a synopsis provided online)
- Your personal response to the film
- How it relates to what you are learning in class
Part B
- Provide 3 key quotes or claims presented by the film
- Select one major claim and investigate it. Is it supported by science? How do you know? Provide some evidence (i.e. from textbook or reliable source – i.e. government website, university website, research paper, etc.). Cite your sources.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Agriculture Documentary Schedule Paper Discussion
Agriculture Documentary Schedule Paper Discussion