Climate Change Norms as Scientists Analysis

Climate Change Norms as Scientists Analysis

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Climate Change Norms as Scientists Analysis

In your essay, do the following:

1. Include an introduction about the research you have conducted.
2. State your hypothesis, recap the methods, and outline the project design of the behavior change challenge assignment.
3. State your independent variable, dependent variable, and control.
4. Talk about any unexpected observations and challenges you encountered during the course of your project.
5. Using three peer-reviewed references, reflect on how your footprint affects aquatic environments, the organisms that live in aquatic environments, and impacts on human health. Summarize your sources to support your ideas.
6. Compare your hypothesis to the end result of your behavior change.
   1. Do the results support or refute the hypothesis? How?
7. Did you adjust your methods to reduce your footprint? Explain why or why not.
8. Finally, explain the effects of your behavior change plan on your footprint to the other people within your community (stakeholders).
   1. Identify community stakeholders who may be impacted by this change.
   2. Evaluate what their positions might be on the effects.
9. From the results of your behavior change plan, explain how they can be used to identify how you can continue to monitor the effects that humans have on their environment through research.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Climate Change Norms as Scientists Analysis

Climate Change Norms as Scientists Analysis

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!