FIU Environmental Science Humanitarian Attacks Prevention Essay

FIU Environmental Science Humanitarian Attacks Prevention Essay

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

FIU Environmental Science Humanitarian Attacks Prevention Essay

Describe an actual or fictional international humanitarian aid worker injury, death, or kidnapping, and how this incident could have been avoided by having implemented one or more of the safety and security measures identified in the UNDAC Manual and/or the OFDA FOG.

The essay should count with at least 1200 words (not counting words from the cover page at the beginning or the reference page at the end); Times New Roman, 12-font size, with 1” margins and 1.5″ line spacing and using APA style and citation guidelines. Be concise and get right to the point but be comprehensive and detailed. Cite the source whenever using an idea that you borrowed from the text (author, year, page #).

Reading material sources to be used for this assignment:

UNDAC (United Nations Disaster and Coordination) Field Handbook (6^th Ed…2013), Chapter H (Safety & Security).

USAID (U.S. Agency for International Development) FOG (Field Operations Guide), for Disaster Assessment and Response Chapter I (General Responsibilities & Information) – version 4.0, Sept. 2005.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow FIU Environmental Science Humanitarian Attacks Prevention Essay

FIU Environmental Science Humanitarian Attacks Prevention Essay

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!