Renewable Energy to Combat Global Warming Discussion
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Renewable Energy to Combat Global Warming Discussion
Renewable Energy to Combat Global Warming Discussion
Renewable Energy to Combat Global Warming Discussion
Bensel and Carbone’s Sustaining our Planet Discussion
Thomas Edison State University Renewable Energy Discussion
Topic Is : Renewable Energy To Combat Global Warming/ Climate change
I have attached sample piece how it should be written
This written assignment must include the following:
- Introduce the topic.
- Discuss your topic selection.
- Explain its background and your rationale for choosing it.
- Describe your personal interest in it.
- Explore its relevance to professional life and of such a research project.
- List the key words used to refine your topic or problem statement.
- Provide the purpose of the paper (explain, analyze, or argue).
- Identify intended audience (general or specialized).
- Indicate your voice as the writer (informer or advocate).
- Identify key points or main question to be studied.
- Draft a preliminary problem statement, thesis statement, or opening hypothesis that includes mention of the context of your topic.
- Provide a summary.
Renewable Energy to Combat Global Warming Discussion
Renewable Energy to Combat Global Warming Discussion
Renewable Energy to Combat Global Warming Discussion
Bensel and Carbone’s Sustaining our Planet Discussion
Bensel and Carbone’s Sustaining our Planet Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
Renewable Energy to Combat Global Warming Discussion
Renewable Energy to Combat Global Warming Discussion