TAMU Occupation National Safety And Health Planning Research
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
TAMU Occupation National Safety And Health Planning Research
Part 1: Planning Research Projects
For this discussion activity, consider a topic that you are interested in researching. Describe whether you would choose a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods method to approach the topic. Using the guidelines for deciding the applicable approach in Chapter 4, detail why you believe your choice is appropriate for the types of data used for decision-making in your chosen industry. Be sure to mention the following as it relates to your topic and the reading:
- Purpose
- Process
- Data Collection
- Data Analysis
- Reporting of Findings
Part 2: Validity & Reliability
Consider a contemporary research problem in your field of study. Describe the application of validity and reliability in developing a study for your selected problem. What are some ways you could ensure conventions of validity and reliability are met? Be sure to discuss how the types of data you may encounter affect how a researcher ensures validity and reliability. Your response should be at least one page.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow TAMU Occupation National Safety And Health Planning Research
TAMU Occupation National Safety And Health Planning Research