Environmental Science Hurricane Michael Disaster Management Paper

Environmental Science Hurricane Michael Disaster Management Paper

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Environmental Science Hurricane Michael Disaster Management Paper

As you study the evolution of emergency management you will  come across references to real disaster situations and how emergency  management responded to handle such events.  Much can be learned about  the discipline through such case studies. write a paper on a particular emergency or  disaster situation from the list below that has occurred in the United  States and describe the “lessons learned”.  Using these lessons, I would  like you, at the end of the paper, to identify viable ways that key  lessons could be implemented so agencies handle future incidents better  and do not repeat mistakes made on the identified incident.

1)     A review of current literature on the  particular emergency or disaster to include citations from your textbook  and a minimum of three other publications,

2)     An introduction that includes the background of the event,

3)     A description of the “lessons learned” from the event ,

4)     Your analysis of how such a situation (or the  impact of such a situation) can be prevented in the future or how the  response to a similar emergency or disaster that occur in the future can  be improved upon. This should include how principles learned during the  class from your textbook could be applied (such as use of the N.R.F.,  N.I.M.S., etc.)

5)     Identify viable ways of implementing lessons learned solutions on future incidents.

Structure a real argument and tell a real story. A research  paper is not merely a collection of internet articles and book  citations you dug up and put down on paper, it is the way you weave all  of that into a story that convinces the reader that you know what the  story is and understand how improvement in future such situations can be  made.

 

Topic Choices:

1) Tuscaloosa, AL tornado – 2011 – This event may be a precursor of  things to come, since there is some evidence that “tornado alley” may be  shifting east.

2) Hurricane Michael – 2018 – The impact of this powerful storm is still being felt in Florida.

3)  California “Camp” Fire 2018 – There is a wealth of  information on this tragic incident and wildfires are becoming more  numerous and more intense.

4) New Madrid earthquake 1811 – While this event occurred in  the 1800’s, there is a big concern that we may be close to having  another event in this area. The threat is real enough that response  exercises have been held recently to prepare for another earthquake.

5) Mt. St. Helens Volcano eruption – 1980 While somewhat dated, a  similar event may happen in the future in the Cascade range of the U.S.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Environmental Science Hurricane Michael Disaster Management Paper

Environmental Science Hurricane Michael Disaster Management Paper

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!