- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@crucialessay.com
Illinois Cultural Anthropology Discussion Paper
Illinois Cultural Anthropology Discussion Paper
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99% Instructions
Illinois Cultural Anthropology Discussion Paper
For this assignment, you will write about protein and analyze your protein intake.
Look at your results from your week 3 assignment or visit the My Plate website.
How much protein should you be currently getting?
Where do you think you are in comparison to these recommendations?
Do you think that you should eat more/less/the same amount of protein?
What type of protein are you eating?
Can you change to healthier options for acquiring protein?
Soy
Read this article about soy and then write responses to these questions:
What are the pros and cons of consuming soy as a protein?
Is soy a good choice for protein? Would you recommend eating soy to your client?
Please comment using the science of nutrition.
You are welcome to find/contribute other sources of information about soy. Please cite.
Criteria
Your paper must meet the following criteria:
Between 1 – 2 pages page, double spaced in essay form of writing.
Double-spaced and in 12-point Times New Roman font.
Reference page
To cite at least 2 references from reputable sources (wiki is not a reputable source) and the use of in-text citations
Physical Activity Assessment
Part of the requirements of this class is exercise. As the Catalog Description states, “A combination of physical activity and lecture providing regular exercise to develop physical fitness.”
You are required to exercise 3 times per week.
Each week I will provide 3 recorded yoga classes so you can exercise at home at your convenience.
Each class is approximately 35-50 minutes long.
When you have completed all three classes you will submit your answers to the following questions.
What did you enjoy about each of the three classes? Please designate each class. For example, Class #1: I enjoyed the feeling of relaxation after I was done taking the class. You will say something about each class.
What was difficult about the class, or did anything hurt? Be specific. That way I can help. You may also ask a question and I will answer your question in the comments area when I grade your weekly exercise assignment.
https://cccconfer.zoom.us/rec/play/eRLIinjC9F6H5hQBRc-71Jr7JIzcJxcgTM-SPFtJMt0UYKYACwAQP2rp-6BTi7eHlSi8FeNMMlJvBS5T.tY60sOYBLY2HuRm1?startTime=1599678012000&_x_zm_rtaid=v6hAx5wQRkyUK7Zvhpmsiw.1663051498200.806821cafd32acfe05b9d852392170ac&_x_zm_rhtaid=801
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support 91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology 58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Illinois Cultural Anthropology Discussion Paper
Illinois Cultural Anthropology Discussion Paper
