BSBDIV501 Management of Diversity in Workplaces

BSBDIV501 Management of Diversity in Workplaces

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

BSBDIV501 Management of Diversity in Workplaces

BSBDIV501 Management of Diversity in Workplaces

Assessment Submission details:

1. Please include following details on the top of your assessment:

• Your Name
• Your Student Id
• Your Trainer’s name
• Title of your Assessment
• Assessment Due Date
• Actual Submission Date

Please Note: Any changes in the assessment due date must be approved by your trainer.

2. This assessment can be hand written or in Microsoft word format. Following settings should be made for this assignment to keep consistency among all the assessments:

Body text	Page setup
· Font: Times New Roman · Font size: 12 point · Line spacing: Double · Text style: Normal	· Top: 2.54 cm · Bottom: 2.54 cm · Left: 3.17 cm · Right: 3.17 cm · Header: 1.25 cm · Footer: 1.25 cm

3. If handwritten assessments are submitted, hand writing needs to be clear and legible.
4. Do not forget to attach the Cover Sheet at the front of the assessment.
5. Make sure you have signed the Cover sheet to declare this is your own work.
6. You can e-mail this assessment to your trainer’s e-mail address with following details:

In ‘subject’ mention your ‘student Id – Your name’.

Achieving Competence:

To be deemed competent in this assessment you must:

• Correctly address all of the assessment requirements as described in this task
• Correctly address all of the submission instructions
• Successfully complete the Assessment Questions
• Submit assessment on or before the due date with an assessment cover sheet

Performance objective:

The purpose of this assessment is to assess your ability to complete tasks outlined in elements and performance criteria of this unit in the context of the job role, and:

1. demonstrates the application of diversity policy in a work context
2. critically reviews a diversity policy
3. implements strategies to ensure that diversity is understood and respected in the work team
4. demonstrate compliance with procedures for handling complaints or harassment allegations
5. promotes the benefits of diversity to others

Assessment description:

This assessment consists of a series of tasks which include

1. research of legislation – key aspects, requirements and complaint processes
2. identification of current initiatives and the potential for integrating these in the management of a diverse workforce

iii. development of a diversity policy which can be implemented in a diverse workplace based on the values identified from the current projects and based on legal requirements identified

1. development of an anti-bullying/anti-harassment policy with clear procedures for informal and formal complaint stages

You are required to address all tasks set out below. The website link provided is current as of 27 September 2014 including the information relating to current initiatives.

Whilst EEO legislation covers the general aspects related to Equal Opportunity Employment, the intention of this project is to identify contemporary aspects which would be beneficial for a diverse team in the workplace. You are encouraged to evaluate current programs and identify which aspects can be implemented in a sustainable manner in industry.

The link and information provided on the websites are sources of information and all responses you provide here must be clearly referenced. Policies and procedures must be your own work.

Your trainer will provide you with feedback within agreed timelines as outlined to you.

Assessment Questions:

Question 1: Go to the website https://www.humanrights.gov.au/our-work/legal/legislation and identify the purpose of the following Acts ;

1. a) Age Discrimination Act, 2004
2. b) Disability Discrimination Act, 1992
3. c) Racial Discrimination Act, 1975
4. d) Sex Discrimination Act, 1984
5. e) Australian Human Rights Commission Act, 1986

For each of the 5 acts, briefly explain;

• What is covered by the act
• Who does this apply to in the workforce
• What is the relevance in a workplace?

Question 2: Current projects that have been implemented as part of the national strategies for each of the following acts can be found on the relevant areas of www.humanrights.gov.au.

Go to this website, locate the “Projects” tab and review some (2 or 3) of these current projects and analyse the key factors and campaigns which would be beneficial and could be adapted for managing a diverse workplace.

Which potential benefits for a workplace can you find in each of these projects?

1. a) Age Discrimination Act, 2004
2. b) Disability Discrimination Act, 1992
3. c) Racial Discrimination Act, 1975
4. d) Sex Discrimination Act, 1984

Question 3: Choose 1 of the following options:

1. a) Review your existing diversity policy in the workplace (if one exists) and compare what is included to what should be included. Identify what is potentially lacking and which of the aspects you have researched could be included

OR

1. b) Given consideration to the requirements you have identified in Question 1 and the positives you have analysed and identified in Question 2; develop a diversity policy which sufficiently covers all aspects required to manage diversity in a contemporary, modern workplace which fosters effective communication and promotes harmony and an inclusive team

Question 4: Develop a bullying/harassment policy that can be used in your workplace. The policy needs to include:

• The legal requirements set out by law
• Examples of what is defined as bullying and harassment and what is not
• A clear statement that will outline the processes and procedures to be followed in case of any incident including the stages of informal and formal procedures.
• A statement as to how you will implement this policy in the workplace and ensure staff are trained and aware on an ongoing basis as part of an integrated consultation process.

(You may access and reference you state WHS legislation or Fair work for specific requirements in your state and the following link is provided as a useful checklist:

Bullying Policy Checklist for employers page – Comcare

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow BSBDIV501 Management of Diversity in Workplaces

BSBDIV501 Management of Diversity in Workplaces

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!