FPX 2000 Marriage in Massachusetts and The New York States

FPX 2000 Marriage in Massachusetts and The New York States

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

FPX 2000 Marriage in Massachusetts and The New York States

Write an essay comparing two U.S. states’ approaches to issues of same-sex marriage or immigration policy.

Note: You must complete Assessment 4 before beginning this assessment.

How can sociological research help us understand how laws and policies are made and how they change over time? How might we use the sociological perspective to develop more effective solutions to political and social issues or create policies that are effective and based on sound research? These are questions to consider as you explore the connection between political and economic power and legislative decision making.

In this final assessment, you study how our culture’s beliefs about diversity are reflected in the law-making and policy-making process, including laws and policies that pertain to immigration and same-sex marriage. As you compare and contrast how two specific states have approached immigration or same-sex marriage, reflect on which sociological theories (such as power elite theory, state autonomy theory, or pluralism) best apply to the policy decisions that have been made in your states. Something to think about, too, is whether the policies and positions maintained by those in power actually reflect the research and data on the topic or issue they address. The research you do for this final assessment should show you how power and politics, as well as population demographics, influence policy making.

Demonstration of Proficiency

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:

COMPETENCY 1: DESCRIBE THEORETICAL IDEAS OF POWER IN RELATION TO POLICY.

Discuss contrasts in how states approach a diversity issue, using theoretical ideas of power.

Competency 2: Identify historical and contemporary influences of discrimination in U.S. culture.

Discuss law, policy, or politics in states with varying approaches to a diversity issue.

Competency 3: Analyze the effects of social policy using aggregated data.

Analyze data to project how state policies might affect population migration.

Competency 4: Analyze how laws are applied or created based on race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, age, and social class.

Discuss contrasts between two states in areas of law, politics, or policy as they apply to a diversity issue.

Competency 5: Apply diversity strategies in professional, educational, and personal contexts.

Apply historical solutions to an issue where there are discrepancies between state and federal diversity law.

Competency 6: Communicate effectively.

Write coherently to support a central idea in appropriate format and with few errors of grammar, usage, and mechanics.

Instructions

Building on your research and analysis of the immigration policy or same-sex marriage debates, this assessment asks you to more closely examine the connection between power, policy, and law making by comparing and contrasting how two states have handled these issues.

In order to understand the link between power and political and legal decision making, you will place this process in each state in the appropriate context. That means that you need to assess the historical, demographic, cultural, and socioeconomic factors that have influenced each state’s different approach to immigration policy or same-sex marriage. You will also reflect on the consequences of state-to-state discrepancies in policies and laws regarding controversial social and political issues like these.

This assessment combines the key components of studying cultural diversity from a sociological perspective—placing current social issues in historical context, understanding how demographic and cultural trends influence public opinion, and applying sociological theories to determine the role of power in shaping policy-making decisions.

Write an essay addressing each of the following three parts:

Part 1 – Complete the following:

Discuss one of the following for each of the two states you have chosen as it relates to your chosen topic:

Law (rules and standards enforced by a particular institution).

Politics (the key political players in the policy-making and law-making processes).

POLICY (PRINCIPLES OR METHODS USED TO ACHIEVE A PARTICULAR GOAL OR MAKE DECISIONS ABOUT POLITICAL OR SOCIAL ISSUES).

Discuss theories of power that might explain the differences between how each state has handled your issue.

Examples of theories of power include power elite theory, the four networks theory of power, pluralism, Marxist theory, and state autonomy theory.

Discuss other possible explanations for the differences in how each state’s government has approached your topic. Address at least three of the following potential factors, and come up with another of your own that might explain the divergent approaches you have identified:

Demographics of the state population, including age, race/ethnicity, gender, and percentage of the population in urban versus rural areas.

Geography.

Religion.

History.

Socioeconomic standing, including median or average income and education levels of the population, as well as the overall economic well-being of each state.

Part 2 – Answer the following, incorporating data to support your answers:

To what extent have these states’ existing policies and laws affected past or recent migration patterns of the groups affected (immigrants or those seeking same-sex marriage rights)?

How might future migration patterns be affected?

Part 3 – Complete the following:

Reflect on a historical precedent in which a state has had to alter its laws as a result of inconsistencies with federal law.

Why and how did the state change its laws?

What lessons might be learned from this precedent, and how can those lessons be applied to your topic?

Additional Requirements

Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.

Length: 6–8 pages, not including the title and reference pages.

Format: Include a title page and reference page, and format the essay and your citations according to current APA style and formatting guidelines.

Sources: Cite at least four credible, scholarly sources to support your points.

Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12-point.Resources: Theoretical Sources

This assessment requires application of a specific sociological theory to your analysis of same-sex marriage or immigration policy. Below are resources that discuss appropriate theories.

Domhoff, W. (2015). Theories of power. Retrieved from http://www2.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/theory/

This resource discusses several sociological theories of power, including the four network theory, pluralism, and state autonomy theory.

Schatz, P. (2017). Theoretical perspectives on government and power. Retrieved from http://philschatz.com/sociology-book/contents/m429…

This chapter from a sociology text examines how the major theories approach power in relation to government and policy-making.Resources: Policy Issues

Below are resources that cover policy and legal issues related to same-sex marriage and immigration.

Alvarez, P. (2017, February 19). A brief history of America’s ‘love-hate relationship’ with immigration. Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/…

This article traces the history of social and policy responses to immigration.

Healey, J. F., Stepnick, A., & O’Brien, E. (2019). Race, ethnicity, gender, and class: The sociology of group conflict and change (8th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Available in the courseroom via the VitalSource Bookshelf link.

Chapters 10, 12, 13, and 14 deal with political issues and policy concerns relevant to same-sex marriage and immigration.

Mitchell, J. L., & Petray, E. (2016). The march toward marriage equality: Reexamining the diffusion of same-sex marriage among states. Public Policy and Administration, 31(4), 283–302.

This article reviews state marriage policies in the context of the federal legalization of same-sex marriage.

National Conference of State Legislatures. (2015.) Same-sex marriage laws. Retrieved from http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/same-s…

This resource provides an overview of same-sex marriage laws prior to the 2015 Supreme Court ruling that legalized gay marriage nationwide.

Orrenius, P. M., & Zavodny, M. (2017). Creating cohesive, coherent immigration policy. Journal on Migration and Human Security, 5(1), 180–193.

This article reviews problems and limitations with U.S. immigration policy and ways to develop a more cohesive, effective policy.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow FPX 2000 Marriage in Massachusetts and The New York States

FPX 2000 Marriage in Massachusetts and The New York States

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!