Social Psychology Research Proposal Paper

Social Psychology Research Proposal Paper

Table of Contents

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Social Psychology Research Proposal Paper

Social, Psychology, Research, Proposal, Paper

The written research proposal will be created based on a narrowly defined aspect of the topic selected in Week One. A research proposal is a detailed plan for a specific study to be conducted at a future time. It is the document which potential researchers typically submit to an institutional review board (IRB) for ethical review and approval, and/or to funding agencies to secure financial support for a research effort.

Because it is a plan for research which has not yet been conducted, the Methods section should be written in the future tense and should not contain any hypothetical results. The paper must address all of the components required in the Methods section of a research proposal. The following actions must be completed.

State the research question and/or hypothesis.

Briefly compare the characteristics of the major research paradigms used in previous studies on the chosen topic. Introduce the specific approach (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods), research design, sampling strategy, data collection procedures, and data analysis techniques to be used in this study. Provide a short explanation as to why the selected procedures are more feasible than other alternatives for the research topic.

Describe any relevant variables, measures, and statistical tests.

Apply ethical principles and professional standards to the proposed psychological research. Provide an analysis of any ethical issues that may arise and explain how these issues will be resolved.

The following headings for the required sections and subsections must appear in the paper. In accordance with APA style, all references listed must be cited in the text of the paper.

Introduction

Introduce the research topic, explain why it is important, and present an appropriately and narrowly defined research question and/or hypothesis.

Literature Review

Evaluate the published research on the chosen topic including a minimum of three peer-reviewed articles. Summarize the current state of knowledge on the topic, making reference to the findings of previous research studies.

Briefly mention the research methods that have previously been used to study the topic. State whether the proposed study is a replication of a previous study or a new approach employing methods that have not been used before. Be sure to properly cite all sources in APA style.

Methods

Design – Create a feasible research design that incorporates appropriate methods to address the topic. Indicate whether the approach of the proposed study is qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods. Identify the specific research design, and indicate whether it is experimental or non-experimental.

Evaluate the chosen design and explain why this design is feasible and appropriate for the topic and how it will provide the information needed to answer the research question. Cite sources on research methodology to support these choices. Include a minimum of two peer-reviewed sources.

Participants – Identify and describe the sampling strategy to be used to recruit participants for the study. Estimate the number of participants needed, and explain why this sampling method is appropriate for the research design and approach.

Procedure/Measures – Apply the scientific method by describing the steps to be taken in carrying out the study. Identify any test, questionnaire, or measurement instrument to be utilized. If an existing published instrument will be employed, briefly describe it and cite the source.

If an original questionnaire, survey, or test will be created for the project, describe the types of information that will be collected with it and explain how the validity and reliability of the instrument will be established. If such an instrument will not be used, describe how the data will be collected for the study.

Data Analysis – Describe the statistical techniques (if quantitative) or the analysis procedure (if qualitative) to be used to analyze the data. Cite at least one peer-reviewed source on the chosen analysis technique.

Ethical Issues – Analyze the impact of ethical concerns on the proposed study, such as confidentiality, deception, informed consent, potential harm to participants, conflict of interest, IRB approval, etc. After analyzing the ethical issues that apply to the project, indicate what will be done to handle these concerns.

Conclusion

Briefly summarize the major points of the paper and reiterate why the proposed study is needed.

Field Psychology Scientific Method

In social psychology, there is a subtopic known as social cognition. Social cognition’s main focus is on how individuals store, process and apply information concerning social situations and other people. It shows us the role of cognitive processing in our social interaction.

In order for people to have the advantage of being part of certain social groups, various psychological processes have to take part and they are controlled by social cognition.

Various social signals are of importance to social cognition. These signals enable individuals to learn about the world that surrounds them. These signals include facial expressions such as disgust and fear which warn us of danger, as well as eye gaze direction which shows the direction of interesting things.

In the article, “The Role of Social Cognition Skills (SCS) and Social Determination of Health (SDH) in Predicting Symptoms of Mental Illness,” the author uses a quantitative method of research. The article focuses on mental health and psychiatric disorders.

In the study, the method used was implemented from a randomized sample assessed in the Colombian National Mental Health Survey to evaluate the role of SCS, SDH and psycho-physical factors as predictors of mental illness symptoms (Santamaría-García, 2020).

The results from the assessment that the best predictors of symptoms of mental illness were cognitive functioning, the presence of chronic diseases, a medical history of psychiatric disorders, social adverse factors as well as emotion recognition skills. According to the author of the article, the study provided unprecedented evidence on social factors and the impact it has on predicting symptoms of mental illness as well as highlighting the importance of these factors in order to track the onset and early stages of the disease.

To explore social cognition and social psychology as a whole and for better understanding, there are different special research methods that can be used. The methods used in the research to answer questions are both qualitative and quantitative. The qualitative research method is used to make an analysis of data that is not reducible to numbers.

The methods of collecting information and data and generating it include interviews; an interview involves a conversation between a researcher and the respondent. The researcher sets questions with the agenda in place and the interviewee will give answers.

There is also focus groups which have a moderator who leads in the group discussions. Thirdly there is the use of naturally occurring data, this is the information that is produced in the occurrence of everyday life. Lastly, there is the use of structured methods of collecting data such as open-ended questioners or vignettes.

Under qualitative data analysis, the methods of collecting data include, qualitative data analysis. This method involves developing categories and counting the number of times in which these categories appear in a corpus of data. And experimental and none experimental methods (Figgou, 2015).

From the article, the study was not based on different research methods to draw a conclusion. The only method of research used was SEM which is a quantitative model of research.

The author should have also used a qualitative method by having interviews with patients with mental illness and having open-ended questioners to have a better-drawn conclusion. The validity and reliability of one method of research is questionable. Utilizing both qualitative and quantitative method can help a research come up with better results.

References

Figgou, L. (2015). Social Psychology: Research Methods. Research Gate.

Santamaría-García, H. (2020). The Role of Social Cognition Skills (SCS) and Social Determinants of Health (SDH) in Predicting Symptoms of Mental Illness. SSRN.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Social Psychology Research Proposal Paper

Social Psychology Research Proposal Paper

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!